Saturday, 3 November 2018

Effectiveness of employee engagement


Employee engagement

 “Engagement is a fundamental human need. It is a power that resides in most people, waiting to be unlocked. People want to be engaged in what they do. If employers build the foundation, employees will do the rest” (Maylett and Warner, 2014, p.4). Employee engagement is the motivation and commitment of the staff towards the work of the organization (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). Moreover, according to Mathis and Jackson, (2008) extent of the employee’s devotion and augmentation define as the employee engagement. As an illustration, the topic can expound as a conception where the employees are involving by spending time and draw the commitment through willingness (Macey et al., 2009).


Alternatively, employees expect value and recognition from employer for the job which they complete. In the event of such, they work and confident. Nevertheless, employees reach an extra mile and deliver excellent on the job performance (Vans, 2006).


Importance

Fully engaged and motivated employee with high morale will always leads to great efficiency and maximum level of productivity in the organization (Robbins, 2013). Be sides, many organizations now taken the employee engagement as a high rated measurement to read the assessment of the organizational performance (Whittington et al., 2017).


The topic treat as the primary driver of profitability, employee loyalty and customer loyalty. Nevertheless, companies which are performing with high level of employee engagement mark their accounting books with low cost entries due to low employee turnover, man-made operational loses and accident. Furthermore, it is not required to have lengthy HR policies to control the behavior of the employee as they are emotionally attached to produce the maximum energy for the organization (Reck, 2016).






(Source : Blessing White 2018)



Road to employee engagement


Employer needs to ensure to create a self-motivate culture in the organization while defusing work place disagreements. Apart from that it is important to elevate work place excellence. At this juncture it is not required to fully concentrate the bonuses and other compensation benefits since the positive culture already impacted on the ground (Friedman, 2014). Moreover, Joshi (2013) demonstrated that there are different ways of strategies which can apply for all organization to have high employee engagement. Accordingly, few of such steps can be decorated as follows,

Empowering employees
Empowerment take place when employees are allocated with authority, faith and encouragement to complete a specific task. This makes the individual more responsible in the duties.

Providing an effective rewarding system
In order to motivate the behavior of employees it is essential to have a proper rewarding system in the organization and it persuade the employees to be consistent on what they do. Further, to get the best from them organization needs to evaluate their contribution by offering bonus, time off and promotions.

Redesigning jobs
Many employees get bored on their job due to absence of new face for same over a period. Hence, restructuring and redesigning of the job profile also a valid fact to enhance the performance of them.

Job enlargement
This will create an additional task to the individual. However, such employee presume that he/she has been recognize as a responsible person in the organization. That presumption assists to create a positive mind set.

Job rotation
Through effective job rotation high enthusiasm can be created among all the staff as they are being allocated in different job roles time to time. Further, employees are compelling to learn and study the co department duties as well. As such, they have a better understanding how the co-workers are engaged to achieve goals of the firm.

Creating flexibility
“Flexi time” permits employees to set and control their own work hours. Due to family needs to staff are not prefer to perform in the time frame of 9-5. Therefore, based on the job profile some are prefer to work under flexi-time. E.g. Marketing staff.

Harter and Wagner (2006) confronted few facts which will assist to build an engage employee such as, to do the best in every day, material and equipment to do the work right, recognition and praise for the good job they do and the employee opinion seems to be considered. Similarly, superior needs to care of the subordinates. Encouraging the development of the staff, evaluate the progress in regular intervals are vital aspects in the move to make a platform for learn and grow.


Thus, according to Paxton (2015) there are two factors which are mainly impact for the engagement of the employees. Those are hygiene and motivation factors. Hygiene factors are also announcing as maintenance factors. These factors are not direct course to the job profile but such conditions assist to execute the job properly. When these facts are not in order it persuade employees to be get dissatisfy. The motivator factors pertain to the job and intrinsic to the job itself. The same do not resulted from carrot and stick incentives. It includes the physiological need for growth and recognition and it create sentimental value for the employee. The absence of these factors does not caused to highly dissatisfaction. However, when it present strong bond will create with employer which will ultimately furnish good job performance.


(Source : Paxton 2015)





Real life examples from the organization which I work for…

Hygiene factor

In the year 2017, National Development Bank shined up with a special benefit to all the confirmed staff under the medical scheme. Prior to 2017, staff were facilitated with a blanket hospitalization cover of Rs. 300,000/- includes the family members. However, in accordance to the revised medical policy all permanent carders and their family members are entitling to the individual cover of Rs. 300,000/- irrespective the number of members.


Further, commencing from the same year, Management decided to enhance the DSCR eligibility when consider credit facilities for the staff. This assisted to the staff to obtain additional credit facilities from the bank at the public rate, though their staff loan quota is over. These new steps stood as a post to persuade the employees to get engaged in with NDB. In addition to the above the bank provides good working conditions with clean and comfortable office environment, with healthy relationships with superiors and subordinates, the salaries are good and slightly above industry standards, and employees work with minimum supervision.

Motivation factor


Till early 2015, “National Development Bank PLC” failed to have a proper KPI system to evaluate employee performance. Hence, there were many concerns over the selection process to promotions and increments from staff end. This situation led to anchor high staff turnover from different forums from middle management to clerical level. As such, top management implemented a new KPI system named “HCM Cloud”. As a result of that during the year of 2016 to till now a significant reduction of employee resignations can be observed. As per HR sources and calculations it is a drop of 38% compared to the years prior to 2015. 

Moreover, Bank conducts a ceremony in every year called “Retail Banking Awards”. The purpose of organizing this event is to reward the best employees & branches who achieved the assigned targets during the calculated year. Best individuals and units are getting awarded by trophies with cash prices on a big stage in presence of all the employees. These moves created a positive thought in the mind of the staff to be engaged with employer.

Organizational culture makes a considerable impact towards the employee engagement. Though it’s carry out by the HR personals, it’s the responsibility of everybody in the organization. This is one of the important issues in the global context (Jaramillo and Richardson,2017).

Typical HR decision frame works also strike as a sample which block the engagement process. Mostly, when a new proposal comes out to enhance the engagement level, the usual slogan would be “we already have it”. Salary grade system in one of the major fact which elaborate the resistance to engagement. There should be a common architecture system to build the bride and the same should be easily understandable for all the employees of the organization (Cascio and Boudreau, 2011). Moreover, the compensation polices of HR limits the outcome of the employees as the same are outdated. This leads to lift the staff resignation volume. Hence, having a smooth and cured HR policy create the momentum to high employee engagement (McGuire and Brenner, 2015).

Establishing a healthy communication approach is much needed to take the message of the employer to the staff. Organization require to deliver the accurate message to the employees though, the same not reach to them in the accepted way due to the barriers of the messenger. Mostly, this is the duty to the middle management. Hence, in the event of passing the inaccurate content will change the mindset of the staff and the results would be varying with the expected. Accordingly, particularly employee has to face some negative consequences on the performance. In order to prevent from same, a clear communication approach is required and it will be assisted the employee to get engaged with the organization (Ryerson University, 2011).

Hoyle (2013) emphasis, Complete training actualizes the brilliance of creating a workforce. Accordingly, workplace training enables the employees to do things differently and do different thing. When the employer in need to communicate or do a behavioral run in the employees, they use this as a silent killer as the impact will get not expose instead the results. Further, changing behavior is a questionable offence which is hard to read from the eye of the organization. However, when new activities become very often employees hug it from both hands as practice becomes law in real terms. As such, communicating a change in the environment via a complete training session will be a definite plus in the employee engagement.

The experience of the employees also a fact to consider when creating or enhancing employee engagement. This is justifiable and in the discussion of the eye of employee and organization. In the perspective of staff, the experience is the skill and knowledge to work in the organization. However, organization defines the experience as what they really want the employee to be. This is a challenge in day to day life. Hence, just because the organization does something thing will not help the employee to peruse the same (Morgan, 2017).

Availability of positive model to create employee engagement sound good. This assist always to identify organization strength based on the employee feedback. This elaborate where the company needs to be improved and it shows the improvement in level of engagement. Elements of the strategy should be prioritizing as per the best understanding of the institution. However, the clean vision, mission and objectives should be purely based in terms of the organization which suits to the employees (Cook, 2008).


Fast track approach should be shown to all the employees to reach for the higher position in their carrier. This is a resource base thinking and a technique presented in many ways. It is required to present the same in short and understandable way. Then it persuades the employee to accelerate their performance to reach the expected the seat (Ross, 2010).




Conclusion and recommendation


Employee engagement cannot be solely interpreting as a simple human activity. It’s a clean combination of a strategic management and human behavior. Further, Organization productivity, Customer service excellence is driven by the employee engagement. The organization should create an environment for employee engagement to strive by satisfying both hygiene and motivational aspects as per Herzberg’s two factor model.



REFERENCES

Armstrong, M and Taylor, S. (2014) Armstrong's handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 13th ed. London, Koganpage.

Blessingwhite (2018) Engagement model [online]. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com.>. [Accessed on 6 November 2018].

Boudreau, J, W and Ramstad, P, M. (2007) Beyond HR: The new science of human capital. Boston, Harvard Business school publishing corporation.

Cascio, W and Boudreau, J. (2011) Investing in people: Final impacts of human resources initiatives. 2nd ed. New Jersey, Pearson Education, Inc.

Cook, S. (2008) The essential guide to employee engagement: Better business performance through staff satisfaction. London, Kogan page.

Efron, L. (2017) Purpose meets execution: How winning organizations accelerate engagement and drive profits. New York, Bibliomotion Inc.

Friedman, R. (2014) The best place to work: The art and science of creating and extraordinary workplace. New York, Penguin Random House LLC.

Hoyle, R. (2013) Complete Training: From recruitment to retirement. London, Kogan Page Limited.

Jaramillo, S and Richardson, T. (2017) Agile Engagement: How to drive lasting results by cultivating a flexible, responsive and collaborative culture. New Jersey, John Willy and Sons, Inc.

Joshi, M.M. (2013) Human Resource Management. 1st ed. India, Bookboon [Online]. Available at https://premium.bookboon.com.>. [Accessed on 6th November 2018].

Mathis, R. L and Jackson, J. H. (2006,2008) Human Resource Management.12th ed. New York, Thomson South-Western a part of the Thomson corporation.

McGuire, T and Brenner, L. (2015) Talent Valuation: Accelerate market capitalization through your most important asset. New Jersey, Paul Boger.

Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M and Young, S. A. (2009) Employee Engagement Tools for analysis, Practice, and Competitive advantage. West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell.

Maylett, T and Warner, P. (2014) Magic Five keys to unlock the power of employee engagement. Texas, Greenleaf Book Group Press.

Morgan, J. (2017) The employee experience advantage: How to win the war for talent by giving the employees work space they want, the tools they need, and a culture they can celebrate. New Jersey, John Willy and sons Inc.

Maylett, T and Warner, P. (2014) Magic Five keys to unlock the power of employee engagement. Texas, Greenleaf Book Group Press.

Paxton, B. (2015) Herzberg’s Motivation Theory [online]. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com.>. [Accessed on 6 November 2018].

Robbins, J. (2013) Nine Minutes On Monday. The Quick and Easy Way to Manager to Leader. United States of America, The McGraw-Hill companies.

Ryerson University. (2011) Change Management leadership guide. Toronto.

Reck, R. (2016) 100% Employee Engagement introducing a new management model. Revised ed. Tempe, Ross Reck and Associates.

Ross, D. (2010) Managing people & Performance: Accelerate your career. Fast track to success. USA, Pearson education limited.

Sternberg, L and Turnage, K. (2017) Managing to make a difference: How to engage, retain and develop talent for maximum performance. New Jersey, John Willy and Sons Inc.

Vans, R.J. (2006) Employee engagement and commitment: A guide to understanding measuring and increasing engagement in your organization. Alexandria, The SHRM Foundation.

Whittington, J, L., Meskelis, S., Asare, E and Beldona, S. (2017) Enhancing employee engagement: An Evidence-Based Approach. Cham, Springer Nature.

Harter, J. K., Wagner, R. (2006) 12 The elements of great managing: Based on Gallup’s ten million work space interviews – the largest worldwide study of employee engagement. New York, Gallup press.

60 comments:

  1. Hi Dishan, A conceptual model of employee engagement, presented by Shuck et al. (2011, p. 429), reveals that three variables, namely job fit, effective commitment,and psychological climate, are suggested to influence the development of employee engagement.The research surrounding employee engagement up to now proves informative but has focused mainly on how organizations engage their employees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Vinalo,

      The authors have further confronted that job fit, effective commitment and psychological climate are mainly supersede in the culture of the organization. Hence, the same has been elaborated in the blog by applying for my organization.



      Delete
  2. Adding some more points Johnson (2004) highlighted that organisation need to be more flexible according to the new technology and work environment throughout the company. They need to understand that the company was not in same level in few years ago. Employees adjust by themselves to the work in their lifestyle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. Changing culture eventually persuade the organization to get involve in new procedures and techniques. Hence, it generates substantial leeway for the staff to get engage and move with the innovates.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Having a broad view of the strategy of the organization is of utmost importance when it comes to employee engagement, and also they need to recognize the bigger depiction in order to understand the importance of their individual functions on attaining the organizational goals (Anne, 2011).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes.

      Furthermore, it is not required to have lengthy HR policies to control the behavior of the employee as they are emotionally attached to produce the maximum energy for the organization (Reck, 2016).

      Delete
  5. Adding more points enhancing engagement is a non-stopping process which creates meaningful and emotional bonding with work. Moreover, it does not make only happy employees with full incentives/salaries as well as creating employees who enjoyed working in the organisation with a higher retention level (Towers Perrin (2003). According to Stairs and Galpin (2010) low absence, high productivity, quality products, increased sales, higher profitability, customer satisfaction, faster business growth and higher chance of business success mentioned as the outcomes of employee engagement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Hi Rukshan,

      On that note, Alternatively, employees expect value and recognition from employer for the job which they complete. In the event of such, they work and confident. Nevertheless, employees reach an extra mile and deliver excellent on the job performance (Vans, 2006).

      Delete
  6. Hi Dishan,The involvement of engagement at work can differ between individuals over time and is likely to vary on a daily basis within one employee (Sonnentag, 2003; Kahn, 1990). Graen (2008) proposes that engagement may protect an organisation’s bottom‐line profit when the local or global economy is in the midst of a collapse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Accepted.

      To be more proven the authors have demonstrated that the level of engagement can not be calculated from the time which a staff spend in the organization.

      Delete
  7. Employee engagement is a key factor for organizational success. Therefore the organization should focus on the aspect of employee engagement in order to improve organizational performance (Basbous, 2011; Sundaray, 2011). Engaged employees provide a lot of benefits to the organization such as productivity, improved quality, customer care, cooperation among the employees, reduced employee turnover, reduced absenteeism and disputes (Wilson, 2009; Mortimer, 2010).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Human resource system does play a huge part in employee engagement, like staffing, training, and development practices. This will contribute to enhance competitive advantage and potentially maintain the organization and employee fit (Yupono, 2014).

      Delete
  8. Adding more on enhancing employee engagement, Jenkins and Delbridge (2013) proposed that in line with Story’s (1989) contrast between ‘hard ‘and ‘soft’ HRM it was possible to distinguish between hard and soft management approaches to enhancing engagement. In their case studies of two companies, one adopted a soft approach that centered on work design and promoting positive workplace conditions and relationships between management and employees. Enhanced employee engagement was seen as a positive outcome – productivity was not the primary goal. In the other case, a ‘hard’ approach concentrated on directly increasing employee effort to improve organizational performance. In the company using a soft approach high levels of engagement were reported, while in the other company high levels of employee disengagement were evident

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes Nalin exactly.

    Moreover, it is not required to fully concentrate the bonuses and other compensation benefits since the positive culture already impacted on the ground (Friedman, 2014)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Employee engagement also depends with the manager or the supervisor. As when the managers have a servant leadership behavior the responsibility is to support and serve who are around and then the environment is highly engaged. (Cufaude,2004).Further in order to create a highly engaged working environment the engagement of the managers are important .Employees will not take any interest to engage themselves if the managers are not engaged (Soltis,2004).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Employee motivation is the effect an organization could make for an employee in a way to operate in an organization, it determine the success or failure of the organization. Influencing the behaviors of their employees to behave in certain ways is also important (Dongho, 2006).

      Delete
  11. Furthermore, for the definition of employer engagement is combination of job satisfaction, motivation and commitment from employee towards the organization Growth. Armstrong (2014).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. according to Paxton (2015) there are two factors which are mainly impact for the engagement of the employees. Those are hygiene and motivation factors. Hygiene factors are also announcing as maintenance factors. The same has been elaborated in my grid.

      Delete
  12. Hi Dishan,To add further more to your details, As Stated by Kanh “the harnessing of organizational members’ selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively and emotionally during role performances”(Kahn,1990).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Job satisfaction is related to company commitment, job involvement, organizational citizenship behaviors and mental health and therefore job satisfaction will have an impact on employee engagement and this will negatively relate to turnover and stress (Lu Lu, Gursoy, & Neale, 2016).

      Delete
  13. Hi Dishan, you have taken employee empowerment as a step on the road to employee engagement, and suggest that the employees should be given authority to complete tasks that will affect the customer. But good empowerment is not just about decentralizing decision making and sharing authority; it also means making sure that employees have the information required to make good decisions and the competencies to use that information to serve customers. (storey et al., 2009)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is important to have a delegating authority for the certain levels of employees. In the event fail to take decision on right time will leads to create demotivate though in the mindset of the staff (Neale, 2018)

      Delete
  14. It also can be commented as for an organization to be successful leadership plays a crucial part. Positive leadership would result in collaboration between the worker and the company. Which has a significant effect on the employee’s ability to commit to work. (MacLeod and Clarke, 2009).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Effective leader will rollover the level of engagement of the staff and it creates pleasant environment to work (Berger, 2011)

      Delete
  15. It can also be added as there are several attributes which are identified which affects the employee engagement towards the organization. Some of them which are identified are Work, Leadership and Organizational Interaction (Macey and Scheneider, 2008).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Healthy leadership decision will help to merge the relationship between the employee and employer. This will enhance the productivity (MacLeod and Clarke, 2009).

      Delete
  16. Employee engagement has emerged as one of the greatest challenges in today’s workplace. With complexities and stringent regulations in many organizations, employee engagement will continue to challenge organizations in the future. This aspect challenges management because engagement is a critical element in maintaining the organization’s vitality, survival, and profitability(Osborne & Hammoud, 2017).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sustainability of the organization depends on the performance of the staff and it is important to measure the level of the engagement (Joshi, 2011)

      Delete
  17. .Reilly and Brown (2008) noted that the terms ‘job satisfaction’, ‘motivation’ and ‘commitment’ are generally being replaced now in business by ‘engagement’ because it appears to have more descriptive force and face validity. Truss et al (2013) suggested that ‘engagement may constitute the mechanism through which HRM practitioners impact individual and organizational performance’

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thus, job satisfaction generates through motivation. Hence, to establish loyalty work force it is required to have a job satisfaction leads environment (Elliott, 2018).

      Delete
  18. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Whilst it is acknowledged that employee engagement has been defined in many
    different ways, it is also argued the definitions often sound similar to other better known and
    established constructs such as ‘organisational commitment’ and ‘organisational citizenship
    behaviour’ (OCB) (Robinson et al 2004). Thus Robinson et al (2004) defined engagement as
    ‘one step up from commitment’. As a result, employee engagement has the appearance of
    being yet another trend, or what some might call “old wine in a new bottle”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Organizational commitment based on the individual staff contribution. When employees are fail to deliver the best will caused to flop the commitment of the organization (Bose, 2004).

      Delete
  20. Hi Dishan,
    Except for the facts you have presented, an employee’s perceived organizational support (POS) affects employee engagement which is a classic construct in work relations, and is defined as the beliefs that employees possess that their organization values their contributions and considers their well-being (Pati and Kumar, 2010). POS is significant since it influences the quality of the supervisor–employee relationship and predicts employee engagement (Saks, 2006), organizational commitment, citizenship behavior, and retention (Pati and Kumar, 2010). Furthermore, Gillet et al. (2013) found that employees who feel that they are supported by their organization, through recognition and authority, display higher levels of self-determined motivation and work engagement. Hence, employees of organizations that ensure perceived organizational support (POS) are expected to have a competitive advantage over those that do not foster the emotional attachment of their workers (Alvi et al., 2014).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In any organization's competitive advantage is the well trained and loyalty staff. In order to have such work force it is required to have motivated employees (Wood, 2004)

      Delete
  21. As stated by Alfes et al (2010:5),employee engagement as having three core facets.
    1 intellectual engagement – thinking hard about the job and how to do it better.
    2 affective engagement – feeling positively about doing a good job.
    3 social engagement – actively taking opportunities to discuss work-related improvements with others at work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Further, engagement stand to deliver high performance of the organization and it assist to not to improves efficiency, but also it can be used at any stage of the recruitment process (Reddy 2016)

      Delete
  22. Hi Dishan,
    Agree with you on Hygiene and Motivation Factors. Hygiene Factors such as, Working Conditions, Salary and Benefits, Supervision, Job Security will prevent dissatisfaction of the employees (Asim, 2013). Further, Motivational Factors such as, Recognition, Achievement, Advancement will boost high level of job satisfaction and extra performance (Dobre, 2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ulrich (2012) stated that, recognition & achievement creates more weight-age in creation of motivated staff.

      Delete
  23. Hi Dishan, As per Armstrong (2014), to keep the employee’s engagement levels increased, they are needed to be satisfied with the work requirements and meet their personal needs. Therefore, the contents of the job design have to be specified carefully according to meet this requirement. As observed by Wall and Clegg ( 1998, as cited in Armstrong, 2014) the job design has to cover the following aspects to achieve this objective,
    1). Job range – the number of operations employee needs to complete the task.
    2). Job depth – the amount of discretion employee has to decide job outcomes and activities.
    3). Job relationships – the relationships between employee and their co-workers and managers and supervisors.

    ReplyDelete

  24. Employee Engagement is the commitment, passion of employees and successful leadership skills with help from the best administration to the employees. Human resource pioneers set the drive and belief of their organization and spread that positive confidence to the representatives in the organization
    (Sarangi & Nayak 2016)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Accurate leadership decision always show the right direction to the subordinates. The same will assist to create the positive factor in the mindset of employees (Ulrich 2005)

      Delete
  25. Dishan, As you explained, Organizations expect employees to always play their part and create new ideas and make new proposals to improve their services and save money on them (Skapinker, 2005).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In order to have a healthy organizational environment, staff should know what are their job role. Further, when the employees are full fill the goals of organization, employer must look after the staff and should let them to enjoy their rights (Joshi 2013)

      Delete
  26. In most organizations around the world the proportion of employee engagement is minimum compared to not engagement and actively disengagement. For example, according to the recent research conducted in United Kingdom only 17% employees are engaged 57% are not engaged and 26% are actively disengaged (Allen, 2014,p.1)

    ReplyDelete
  27. In the context of engage and not engage employees the parameters should be accurate. Government sector employees show low engagement than private sector, as they are not been facilitated with certain decision makings or authority. When staff have no power over the duties they act with lazy and when people are awarded with right power that helps to enhance the organizational performance (Ali, 2016)

    ReplyDelete
  28. Would you say, “Employee engagement is a two-way process- it encompasses not only what organisations can do for employees but also how employees can go extra miles for their employers” (Cai, 2014)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Collins (2006) elaborated employee engagement as a win win situation as it helps employer and employee to achieve their own targets.

      Delete
  29. leaders should form a working environment where there is increased employee engagement and participation; communicate goals, gain employee understanding, and apply communication styles that fit the need of each employee at all levels; recognize and plan opportunities for development for employees through training and development; recognize the importance of personally engaging with their employees; and, understand the importance of having consistent meetings to update employees about new products and services ( Thompson 2016).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Training and development take an important part in employee engagement. Lack of knowledge in products of the organization creates negative thoughts in the mindset of the employee since the job can not be executed as expected. Hence, it is required to train them in regular basis (Harrison 2004).

      Delete
  30. Truss (2014) states according to William Kahn(who is widely regarded as the founding father in the field of Employee Engagement), employee engagement is considered to be associated with the ‘needs-satisfying’ approach to motivation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Motivation is the key fact to engagement. Highly motivated employees will holds hand with the organization to in achieving goals (Pexson 2015)

      Delete
  31. Organizations can overcome the engagement issues by developing better leaders who are more emotionally intelligent, which means they are very supportive for their team members performance, and are trustworthy and very keen on their limitations. More importantly, leaders must understand what keeps their employees motivated and engage in enhancing their emotional intelligence which helps them in improving the ability in understanding people (Bolman & Deal, 2014).

    ReplyDelete
  32. Emotional intelligence merge with the motivation. Unable to locate engage employees in an organization who are not motivated (Mercer, 2004)

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hi, Furthermore, Fernandez (2007) shows the distinction between job satisfaction,
    the well-known construct in management, and engagement contending that employee satisfaction is not the same as employee engagement and since managers can not rely on employee satisfaction to help retain the best and the brightest, employee engagement becomes a critical concept.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Adding some more points Johnson (2004) highlighted that the organization needs to be more flexible according to the new technology and work environment throughout the company. They need to understand that the company was not on the same level a few years ago. Employees adjust by themselves to the work in their lifestyle.

    ReplyDelete